<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Today’s in-house legal teams are expected to do more with less: manage contracts, deliver legal support, protect the business and deliver greater value without increasing headcount and overheads. To help alleviate this increasing pressure, many businesses are introducing Legal Operations functions to optimise processes, maximise productivity and minimise costs.

Drawing on non-legal expertise, this function operationalises the Legal team, equipping it with the right technology and processes so it has greater capacity to better manage risk, monitor compliance and protect the business."


Some of the core competencies a Legal Operations function should aspire to, as outlined by CLOC, include:

  • Technology process and support
  • Information governance & records management
  • Financial management

In this article, we explore how implementing CLM software can help Legal Ops to build these competencies, whilst supporting Legal teams and the wider business.

Technology & Process Support

Legal Ops teams have a crucial role to play in scaling businesses. As the legal department  sees its workload increase alongside growth, Legal Ops has a responsibility to ensure growth doesn’t slow down time-to-contract or create unnecessary costs.

Unless growth is sustainable and the right technology is introduced at the right time, bottlenecks, increased organisational risk and hidden costs can quickly occur.

Research from Gartner reveals that 25%–40% of a lawyer’s time is spent on tasks that don’t require a lawyer, resulting in $2.7 million in lost productivity per year at a typical organisation.'


By introducing CLM software to the organisation, Legal Operations can equip in-house lawyers with technology that automates manual tasks, optimises internal processes and gives back valuable time to the team.

This increases Legal’s capacity, gives them time to focus on high-level goals such as resolving litigation issues and ensures they can effectively perform their role. Contract management software can be used to automate tasks such as:

  • Extracting and storing metadata
  • Routing and tracking contract approvals
  • Finding contracts and clauses
  • Sending agreements for electronic signatures
  • Alerting other departments about upcoming key dates and events

Gatekeeper’s unique Kanban Workflow Engine provides visual cards that allow Legal Ops professionals to map out internal processes, gain immediate visibility into the workload of each lawyer and identify bottlenecks.

Auto-actions can be used to automate individual tasks or entire workflows, depending on how much Legal input is needed.

Legal Ops can also leverage contract automation and workflow data to provide meaningful insights to the leadership team. Whether it’s time-to-contract, how much time is spent on negotiation or how long Legal takes to review a contract and why, opportunities can be identified for new efficiencies.

Automate legal processes & allow teams to focus on high-value activities

Gatekeeper helped us to automate a lot of processes around contract management and now we can use the time for something more interesting than endless email exchanges. It's also helping us to track and optimize the workload of each lawyer -  which I would say is personally for me is the ultimate goal in every legal ops process.' -  Anastasiia Sergeeva, Legal Operations Manager, BlaBlaCar

Information governance & records management

In some organisations, contract management doesn’t extend beyond the Legal team. Perceived as the main stakeholder for the entire lifecycle, in-house lawyers spend hours meticulously extracting key metadata, updating records in line with new legislation or regulations and sending agreements.

Overloaded with day-to-day management such as searching for contracts, in-house lawyers may find it difficult to step back and assess potential risks in their organisation.'


Expiring certificates, incomplete vendor records, agreements reaching their expiry date and information in the wrong hands can all cause disruption to the business, with legal teams left facing consequences for any non-compliance and security breaches.

This in turn can increase workload for already over-stretched teams as they are faced with fresh legal disputes that require a swift resolution.

Legal Operations can lead risk mitigation strategies throughout the organisation by implementing a CLM software that centralises and secures key information.'


Providing a single source of truth, Legal Ops can save internal teams time by giving them visibility of the contracts they need to prioritise based on key dates and events.

Combined with automatic notifications to stakeholders when attention is required, Legal teams can focus on dealing with matters of the law - rather than chasing stakeholders for input.

Legal Ops should also seek to put in processes surrounding information security throughout the organisation itself. Providing a solution that has Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC) and permissions can ensure that information meant for the legal team only can be kept that way. This helps to prevent data loss and breaches.

The selected technology should also support processes for handover in the event that a member of the legal team leaves. CLM software allows contracts and documents to be reassigned from a user, before the user is archived within the system.

This prevents any knowledge gaps occurring, protects the knowledge transfer and ensures that the legal team can continue to operate seamlessly and risk-free.

Build a complete and auditable history of contract activity to support compliance

Gatekeeper not only provides information security, document management and centralised visibility. It also creates an auditable history of every action taken against a record, when it happened and who owned it. With this information, Legal Ops can provide leadership with granular insights into information governance.'


Financial Management

In-house counsels using manual processes to manage their daily workload can be easily overwhelmed with tasks that sit outside of their specialism. Whether it’s extracting key data from agreements, chasing third-parties for up-to-date information or looking for information, Legal teams can find themselves facing multiple barriers that prevent them from delivering legal services and advice.

Research from McKinsey reveals that employees spend 1.8 hours every day – 9.3 hours per week, on average – searching and gathering information.'


For every hour that an in-house lawyer is paid to look for a contract or specific clause, for example, spend is also allocated to external counsels for legal services delivery. Legal Operation functions are responsible for making cost savings by enabling the legal department to maximise capacity so external hires aren’t required.

To achieve this, Legal Operations requires insight into the spend dedicated to internal and external counsel - whether that’s cost per contract, the number of billable hours per legal employee or the ratio of billed hours compared to non-billable hours worked.

CLM software helps Legal Ops and Finance work collaboratively with data-driven dashboards that visualise spend data. Legal Ops can drill down into actual spend vs forecast spend for the legal department, identify areas of consolidation and take control of external hires that drive costs up of the entire team.

Identify Legal cost savings with Gatekeeper's Spend Dashboard

Gatekeeper allows Legal Ops leads to categorise external counsel as a Supplier Type, so financial information can be easily accessed through the Spend Dashboard. Visibility of how much is being spent, and where, can help Legal Ops to consolidate external costs and justify any additional spend on increasing internal headcount if it’s required.'

 

Wrap Up

The purpose of the Legal Operations function is to ensure that the in-house legal team can perform to the best of its ability. Among other key tasks, Legal Ops need to implement the right technology to ensure that the legal team can run to capacity while focusing only on its area of expertise - delivering legal services.

Manual processes, managing spend on external counsel and increasing workloads as businesses scale are all barriers that the Legal Ops function is designed to overcome.'


Process optimisation and financial management are pivotal within this role, so selecting the best technology is crucial. Not only will it benefit the Legal Ops function, but it will better serve the legal team who can then focus on higher-value work for the business.

If you’re ready to learn more about why your Legal Ops team should choose CLM software, contact us or book a demo today.

Shannon Smith
Shannon Smith

Shannon Smith bridges the gap between expert knowledge and practical VCLM application. Through her extensive writing, and years within the industry, she has become a trusted resource for Procurement and Legal professionals seeking to navigate the ever-changing landscape of vendor management, contract management and third-party risk management.

Tags

Contract Management , Control , Vendor Management , Compliance , Contract Lifecycle Management , Contract Management Software , Visibility , Contract Lifecycle , Case Study , Supplier Management , Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management Software , Contract Risk Management , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Repository , Regulation , Risk Mitigation , Contract Automation , Regulatory compliance , Third Party Risk Management , TPRM , VCLM , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contract Visibility , Contract and vendor management , Contracts , Procurement , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , contract renewals , Legal , Legal Ops , NetSuite , Podcast , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , Future of Procurement , Gatekeeper Guides , Procurement Reimagined , Procurement Strategy , RFP , Supplier Relationships , Business continuity , CLM solutions , COVID-19 , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Redlining , Contract Review , Contract Risk , Contract compliance , ESG , Financial Services , Metadata , Negotiation , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , webinar , AI , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Approvals , Contract Management Plans , Cyber health , ESG Compliance , Kanban , Market IQ , RBAC , Recession Planning , SOC Reports , Security , SuiteWorld , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Monitoring , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Reporting , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , DORA , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Digital Transformation , Due Diligence , ECCTA , Employee Portal , Excel , FCA , ISO Certification , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Mergers and Acquisitions , Obligations Management , Partnerships , Procurement Planning , Redline , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , SuiteApp , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , Vendor Relationship Management , Vendor risk management , central repository , success hours , time-to-contract , APRA CPS 230 , APRA CPS 234 , Australia , BCP , Bill S-211 , Biotech , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Approval , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Intake , Contract Management Features , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Requests , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Templates , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Cyber security , DPW , DPW, Vendor and Contract Lifeycle Management, , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Disputes , EU , Electronic Signatures , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Gatekeeper , Healthcare , ISO , IT , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Microsoft Word , Modern Slavery , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor Categorisation , Vendor Consolidation , Vendor Governance , Vendor compliance , Vendor reporting , Voice of the CEO , automation , concentration risk , contract management processes , contract reminders , cyber risk , document automation , eSign , enterprise vendor management , esignature , post-signature , remote working , vendor centric , vendor lifecycle management

Related Content

 

subscribe to our newsletter

 

Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates