<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=229461991482875&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Contract reviews involve reading agreements line-by-line ahead of approval and require dedicated time and resources. Businesses rely on their in-house counsels to address legalese and contract terminology, while Contract Managers extract valuable information such as key dates before sharing it with key stakeholders.

However, a high volume of incoming contracts combined with manual contract reviews leads to:

  • Fragmentation as it’s difficult to track and locate all contracts requiring review
  • Bottlenecks as legal teams try to balance reviews with existing workload
  • Contract requests being incomplete and key data not being captured
  • Agreements being signed with ambiguous terms that haven’t been reviewed fully

In this article, we will explore why your business should streamline its contract review processes and how contract management software can help you to do it.

How to improve the contract review process

Contract reviews are often complex processes and can be subject to delays for a variety of reasons. This could be due to an overworked Legal team, a lack of information or simply not knowing requests for a review has been submitted. These scenarios ultimately delay time-to-contract and are all reasons to streamline the process. Let’s break it down further.

1. Eliminate bottlenecks for in-house legal teams when it comes to contract review

Your in-house Legal team has a lot to focus on. A contract review is another task on top of managing compliance, handling any litigation issues and minimising risk. But it’s not a task that’s any less important. When high volumes of contracts come in for review, or colleagues make unexpected requests for contracts, bottlenecks can quickly develop.

Spending hours reviewing agreements line by line, or being interrupted by colleagues in other departments, ultimately slows down time-to-contract and overburdens Legal."


Streamlining through self-serve options, automation and pre-approved templates alleviates pressures on the team. Moving beyond manual processes and relying solely on the Legal team creates less administrative work, eliminates low-value tasks and encourages stakeholders to take a more active role in the contract review process.

2. Visualise and prioritise high-value, strategic work

While eliminating bottlenecks can help the process to become more seamless, it doesn’t stop Legal teams from having competing priorities.

Whether it’s contracts that are coming up for renewal and require a review, agreements going through another round of redlining, or brand new contract review requests being submitted, sometimes it can be hard to see the wood through the trees.

A lack of visibility may result in teams not knowing that a contract is ready to be reviewed, which version requires their attention or how many new contracts are being initiated."


Effectively streamlining contract reviews doesn’t just mean reducing workload. It means giving internal teams the ability to prioritise their work. By automating internal processes and presenting a dashboard of incoming and ongoing contract reviews, stakeholders has visibility of where they need to focus their time and when.  

3.  Delegate workload to stakeholders to increase collaboration

The initial contract review request from stakeholders can cause back and forth if the right information isn’t provided from the outset. If requests don’t include complete and compliant data, time and resource needs to be spent chasing and updating the request. This distracts the in-house counsel from high-value, strategic tasks that should be their main focus.

Mandating information from stakeholders shares accountability for a smooth contract review process across the entire organisation rather than resting on Legal's shoulders."


Contract management is an organisation-wide responsibility. When stakeholders and contract owners take more ownership of their contribution to contract reviews, the process naturally becomes slicker.

Collaboration across multiple departments can also be enhanced when automatic reminders are sent to stakeholders when a contract review is due. This stops them from interrupting the Legal team to ask about contract status.

Contract Reviews and CLM software

When faced with increasing workloads and growing portfolios, manual processes not only hinder contract reviews but can also increase the level of risk within the portfolio. This approach is proving unsustainable for businesses and they are seeking new options.

“By 2024, manual effort for contract review will be reduced by 50% due to adoption of AI-based contract analytics solutions.” - Gartner


Let’s take a look at how you can use contract management software to unlock the benefits listed above.

1. Use self-serve options to speed up contract reviews

How many hours does your Legal team spend reading contracts line by line? These teams often find themselves reading very similar terms - especially in high-volume, low-value agreements such as NDAs and MSAs. Contract management software can save the team valuable hours by automating several aspects of this process.

Gatekeeper allows businesses to reduce review throughput on the Legal team through the creation of an approved boilerplate clause library. With Touchless Contracts technology, they won’t need to approve each and every single NDA or MSA. This saves valuable time. Other stakeholders can create and execute complete and compliant agreements at scale.

Streamline repetitive NDAs with Touchless Contracts from GatekeeperAutomate repetitive tasks and high volume contracts

2. Automate internal processes and improve visibility

Manual contract reviews lend themselves to higher risk and greater delays. By mapping out internal processes and automating with the Kanban Workflow Engine in Gatekeeper, Legal teams and stakeholders can easily see the current status of contracts and the amount of reviews that are incoming.

With visibility of which cards still need to be actioned, everyone in the business can prioritise their time effectively and ensure that hang time for reviews is reduced. The Legal team, contract owners and other stakeholders will know where they need to put their focus when review dates are due.

Contract reviews become standardised, with contracts being automatically routed to the right person. Where more than one stakeholder is required, multiple approval groups can be set up within any internal workflow stage. Parallel approvals are another way to improve efficiency, streamline the process and speed up time-to-contract.

Automate the contract review process with Kanban Workflow Engine from GatekeeperAutomate internal processes with Gatekeeper's Kanban Workflow Engine

3. Give colleagues a dedicated space to submit review requests

Centralisation is key to staying in control of contract reviews. It allows everyone to work from the same page, increases visibility and creates an accurate, up-to-date view of the portfolio. Having all contract reviews submitted through a dedicated Employee Portal makes the initial request process a lot easier to manage.

Requests for new contracts can be vastly improved when colleagues use Public Forms. These forms can mandate what information is required before a contract can progress to review. When mandatory data isn’t provided, the review can’t move forward - saving Legal time and the effort of having to chase stakeholders via email.  

The history of all contract actions carried out  - from a request through to approval - is captured and stamped with names and dates. This provides a defensible audit if the information is ever required at a later stage. These clear timelines save teams time from looking back through emails or chasing colleagues for information.

Manage internal review requests with the Employee Portal from GatekeeperAllow employees to submit requests through a dedicated portal 

Wrap Up

Gatekeeper helps the entire organisation to streamline the processes surrounding contract reviews

Working closely with customers who have wanted to reduce their daily workload, improve visibility of the portfolio and work more efficiently across the business, we know that centralisation, automation and collaboration are key to streamlining any process.

Streamlining the contract review process is beneficial for everyone involved. If you’re ready to speed up time-to-contract, save valuable time for in-house Legal teams and prioritise time more effectively, book your demo today.

Shannon Smith
Shannon Smith

Shannon Smith bridges the gap between expert knowledge and practical VCLM application. Through her extensive writing, and years within the industry, she has become a trusted resource for Procurement and Legal professionals seeking to navigate the ever-changing landscape of vendor management, contract management and third-party risk management.

Tags

Contract Management , Control , Vendor Management , Compliance , Contract Lifecycle Management , Contract Management Software , Visibility , Contract Lifecycle , Case Study , Supplier Management , Vendor and Contract Lifecycle Management , Vendor Management Software , Contract Risk Management , Contract Management Strategy , Contract Repository , Regulation , Risk Mitigation , Contract Automation , Regulatory compliance , Third Party Risk Management , TPRM , VCLM , Workflows , Artificial Intelligence , CLM , Contract Ownership , Contract Visibility , Contract and vendor management , Contracts , Procurement , Supplier Performance , Supplier Risk , contract renewals , Legal , Legal Ops , NetSuite , Podcast , Risk , Vendor Onboarding , Future of Procurement , Gatekeeper Guides , Procurement Reimagined , Procurement Strategy , RFP , Supplier Relationships , Business continuity , CLM solutions , COVID-19 , Contract Managers , Contract Performance , Contract Redlining , Contract Review , Contract Risk , Contract compliance , ESG , Financial Services , Metadata , Negotiation , SaaS , Supplier Management Software , Vendor Portal , Vendor risk , webinar , AI , Clause Library , Contract Administration , Contract Approvals , Contract Management Plans , Cyber health , ESG Compliance , Kanban , Market IQ , RBAC , Recession Planning , SOC Reports , Security , SuiteWorld , Sustainable Procurement , collaboration , Audit preparedness , Audit readiness , Audits , Business Case , Clause Template , Contract Breach , Contract Governance , Contract Management Audit , Contract Management Automation , Contract Monitoring , Contract Obligations , Contract Outcomes , Contract Reporting , Contract Tracking , Contract Value , DORA , Dashboards , Data Fragmentation , Digital Transformation , Due Diligence , ECCTA , Employee Portal , Excel , FCA , ISO Certification , KPIs , Legal automation , LegalTech , Mergers and Acquisitions , Obligations Management , Partnerships , Procurement Planning , Redline , Scaling Business , Spend Analysis , Standard Contractual Clauses , SuiteApp , Suppler Management Software , Touchless Contracts , Vendor Relationship Management , Vendor risk management , central repository , success hours , time-to-contract , APRA CPS 230 , APRA CPS 234 , Australia , BCP , Bill S-211 , Biotech , Breach of Contract , Brexit , Business Growth , CCPA , CMS , CPRA 2020 , CSR , Categorisation , Centralisation , Certifications , Cloud , Conferences , Confidentiality , Contract Ambiguity , Contract Analysis , Contract Approval , Contract Attributes , Contract Challenges , Contract Change Management , Contract Community , Contract Disengagement , Contract Disputes , Contract Drafting , Contract Economics , Contract Execution , Contract Intake , Contract Management Features , Contract Management Optimisation , Contract Management pain points , Contract Negotiation , Contract Obscurity , Contract Reminder Software , Contract Requests , Contract Routing , Contract Stratification , Contract Templates , Contract Termination , Contract Volatility , Contract relevance , Contract relevance review , Contracting Standards , Contracting Standards Review , Cyber security , DPW , DPW, Vendor and Contract Lifeycle Management, , Data Privacy , Data Sovereignty , Definitions , Disputes , EU , Electronic Signatures , Enterprise , Enterprise Contract Management , Financial Stability , Force Majeure , GDPR , Gatekeeper , Healthcare , ISO , IT , Implementation , Integrations , Intergrations , Key Contracts , Measurement , Microsoft Word , Modern Slavery , NDA , Operations , Parallel Approvals , Pharma , Planning , Port Agency , Pricing , RAG Status , Redlining , Redlining solutions , Requirements , SaaStock , Shipping , Spend optimzation , Startups , Supplier Cataloguing , Technology , Usability , Vendor Categorisation , Vendor Consolidation , Vendor Governance , Vendor compliance , Vendor reporting , Voice of the CEO , automation , concentration risk , contract management processes , contract reminders , cyber risk , document automation , eSign , enterprise vendor management , esignature , post-signature , remote working , vendor centric , vendor lifecycle management

Related Content

 

subscribe to our newsletter

 

Sign up today to receive the latest GateKeeper content in your inbox.

Subscribe to Email Updates